**1. Lecture 2: The helium atom **

In this lecture we are going to apply the variational method to a more complicated example, the *helium atom*. The simplified example we consider only involves two particles but still exhibits many of the complications and subtleties that arise in the more general -body problem. Lecture notes can be found in pdf format here.

** 1.1. The hamiltonian **

A helium atom consists of a nucleus of charge surrounded by two electrons.

Let the nucleus lie at the origin of our coordinate system, and let the position vectors of the two electrons be and , respectively. The Hamiltonian of the system thus takes the form

where we are using units so that . We write as , where

and

The only(!) term which causes problems here is the interparticle interaction term , which is the same order as the single-particle potentials. So, unfortunately, we cannot neglect it. However, let’s do so nonetheless: our strategy is to simply solve first to get an idea of the shape of ground-state wavefunctions. Then, inspired by the form of the solution to , we design a trial wavefunction which we subsequently use with the variational method.

** 1.2. Solving **

Notice that that hamiltonian is separable:

where

This means that the eigenfunctions of , *in the case where the particles are distinguishable*, are *products* of the eigenvectors and of and .

We can obtain an eigenfunction of , , by solving the hydrogenic Schrödinger equation

which reads

which is nothing other than the hamiltonian for a “hydrogen” atom with nuclear charge . The lowest-energy eigenstate of is given by

where and is the nuclear charge. The proof of this is left as an exercise (find a reference which solves the Schrödinger equation for the hydrogen atom and replace the nuclear charge with throughout; spherical coordinates are helpful here). The corresponding ground-state eigenvalue is .

\subsubsection{A note on particle statistics} Electrons are indistinguishable fermions. This means that their wavefunction must be *antisymmetric* under exchange of particles, i.e.,

The problem is that if we say the wavefunction for two electrons is a product:

then we run into problems: this wavefunction isn’t antisymmetric under interchange of the two particles!

In order to ensure that the overall wavefunction for the two electrons is antisymmetric we write

(This is a *Slater determinant*.) This expression vanishes when , and is the manifestation of the Pauli exclusion principle. But the trial wavefunction we are going to study has exactly the form of a product of identical wavefunctions, which is incompatible with the particle statistics. In our special case, however, we can largely avoid consideration of the particle statistics by realising that there are two species of electrons, namely, spin-up and spin-down electrons: when magnetic fields and spin-orbit couplings are disregarded we can obtain a perfectly legitimate antisymmetric wavefunction for two — now distinguishable by their spin — electrons in the same wavefunction by writing

i.e., the antisymmetry is carried by the spin degree of freedom. The system is said to be in a *singlet state* with total overall spin. But in this case we can do all our calculations, i.e., calculations of energy expectation values, as though was a product (exercise!); the spin never features in the subsequent derivations.

** 1.3. The variational method, take 1: no variation **

Here we take for our “trial wavefunction” the product of the solutions (8) of the hydrogenic single-particle hydrogenic Schrödinger equations for :

Of course, this isn’t a variational wavefunction: there are no variational parameters! The energy expectation of value of is given by

The observed value is , so this isn’t too bad.

** 1.4. The variational method, take 2: an improved trial wavefunction **

We content ourselves with the simplest possible application of the variational method where we take the variational wavefunction to have the same form as (13) but we replace the nuclear charge with . The physical motivation here is that each electron is partially screened from the nucleus by the presence of the other. Thus our trial wavefunction is

If is left arbitrary then the energy expectation value is

Exercise: work out this result. The minimum of is obtained for , which corresponds to a screening effect where one electron reduces the nuclear charge by approximately one-third of an electron charge. The minimum value is given by

Exercise: compare this with the observed value. How much of an improvement over the crude estimate is there?

** 1.5. Conclusions **

The agreement between theory and experiment can be improved by using a better trial function than the simple products we employed here. The design of such trial functions has occupied researchers since the early days of quantum mechanics. The helium atom is a testbed problem and offers a basic challenge because the two-electron system is mathematically tractable, although solutions in closed form cannot be found. The test of an improved trial state is measured by how closely the variational minimum lies above the precisely measured energy.

oDExf7 http://gdjI3b7VaWpU1m0dGpvjRrcu9Fk.com

I’d like to cancel a cheque underage girls naked

wgb

Could you transfer $1000 from my current account to my deposit account? illegal pedo pics

ohuum

I’m interested in little hot models

:-)))

I’m doing an internship little girls modeling nn

lolyjn

On another call Nymphets Lolitas Girls Underage :-DD

I was made redundant two months ago Pink Teen Models

xxsw

How do you spell that? Lolita Teen

3193